Balls showing veins while locked up, is it safe?

[bbwneedbigdick]

Hey everyone,

I have a CB6000 which I've worn a handful of times (never slept in it). When I'm not aroused, it is very comfortable and I have no issue. However, one of the things my girlfriend likes to do is tease me while wearing the cage, and my balls look exactly like the guy in this photo. Is this dangerous? Is it safe? Are there any long term effects of being able to see the veins like that? When I'm not turned on it goes away. I worry this can cause lasting damage which is what has made it so I don't wear it more than a day at a time. I also enjoy watching porn while wearing the cage (1-2 hrs) and imagine it can't be a good idea to have the veins popping out like that for such a long time.

 

[Hank jones]

Hell my entire balls have been red in the past. Lol
Just some release and go back to being just normal saggy sacs. Lol
Some studys show that long term may cause issues. But not a doctor.

 

[Indago1893]

As a man with only one functioning nut due to an episode of testicular torsion in my early 20's (unrelated to any sexual activity) I can attest to the painful reality of the possibility of one's balls being permanently damaged.

But, by the same token, I have two kids who are definitely mine so maybe no big deal?

 

[Custer Laststand]

I have a CB6000 which I've worn a handful of times (never slept in it).

OK...

When I'm not aroused, it is very comfortable and I have no issue.

Sounds like whoever bought it made a good size selection...

However, one of the things my girlfriend likes to do is tease me while I'm wearing the cage.

Excellent, she has the right idea...

Then, my balls look exactly like the guy in this photo.

Nice photo. "The guy's" balls look more or less normal, although slightly inflated (perhaps).

One of the things your chastity device would accomplish, supposedly, if your woman required you to wear it continuously (by becoming your sole key holder, but letting you out, say, once a week for cleaning) would be to train your brain to not allow your cock to even try to become erect. That is, if it's painful every time you try to become erect after a while your brain would succeed at telling your cock not to do that. Or so "they" say.

Is this dangerous? Is it safe? Are there any long term effects of being able to see the veins like that?

Is it painful when you become aroused? If so, that suggests constriction is reducing circulation to your balls (as well as your cock). That might not be a good thing if continued for very long.

When I'm not turned on it goes away. I worry this can cause lasting damage so I don't wear it more than a day at a time. I also enjoy watching porn while wearing the cage (1-2 hrs) and imagine it can't be a good idea to have the veins popping out like that for such a long time.

Sounds like you enjoy torturing yourself. But, since you don't wear your cock cage for very long it's unlikely to injure you (IMO).

BTW, although you seem to be "getting there" you seem not to have grasped the whole concept. Your woman should, of course, be your sole key holder and the one who makes decisions about when to release you based on her needs for your cock. Before giving her that responsibility which is her due, however, you might consider giving her a present:

Fairbourne, Lucy, "Male Chastity: A Guide for Key Holders."

It can be found, for instance, here:

Amazon.com: Male Chastity: A Guide for Keyholders (9781905605149): Lucy Fairbourne: Books

Then, read it yourself before giving it to her to read. Specifically, look for guidance re. using it without injuring your balls and/or your cock.

For additional information you might try googling the subject.

 

[Custer Laststand]

Is this dangerous? Is it safe?

See, for instance:

Top Ten Tips for Long-Term Male Chastity Device Wear Maybe Maimed but Never Harmed

 

[vladdy]

If your getting sharp stabbing pains I would stop wearing it.

 

[monitaur]

I think that a better question is: 'Is it intelligent?' 'Is it fair?' 'Does chastity actually enhance the tripartate relationship?' There is a reason it is called lockup. Simply being 'more of a man' on the part of a bull, is hardly justification for exerting control over the cuck's monkey spanking. It is not the purview of the wife either. Both should thank the Goddess that hubby is open to sharing to begin with. I remember a standup comedy routine where [presumably male] God and an angel were creating humans sex organs. God kept saying add more nerve endings. More. The angel said there are a lot in there already. God replied I want to hear them say my name. So whether it is intercourse or self 'abuse' some boneheads in this subculture propose locking that up. Makes about as much sense as oil from tar sands.

 

[Custer Laststand]

Makes about as much sense as oil from tar sands.

At last, a good argument...