I think you'll find you can relate to them OK... it won't be impossible.
Hi Ms. Maria,
Richard and Maria Pike said:
Hi Custer, I agree with most of what you say.
Cool... good to hear I seem to have at least most of it right.
Richard and Maria Pike said:
In our case, the emotional skydiving aspect is based on the fact that I do have powerful feelings toward my lovers.
Yes, I'm sure you do. Viewing it from the male side, I find I don't (can't, really) feel sexually attracted to a woman if I don't feel attracted to her on a personal/emotional level. Feeling a connection of that nature is what I think of as "chemistry." I don't know how others... yourself, for instance... define "chemistry," but I would imagine it's in some similar way.
Richard and Maria Pike said:
As near as I can tell from this forum, some cuckoldry is based on the idea of the man's sexual inadequacy, so that the woman needs a "bull" to satisfy her and sometimes she even humiliates her husband about it.
Yes... and the "sexually inadequate" cuckold (if that's the case) gets off on being humiliated by his more strongly-sexual and often, in an interpersonal sense, more dominant wife. That is, he is sexually turned on by the concept and the reality of a female-led (/femdom) marriage, in which his wife is... in essence or explicitly... the head of their household.
Richard and Maria Pike said:
There are other men who simply get aroused at the thought of having a "slut wife" who is promiscuous.
There are quite a few of those on this forum...
Richard and Maria Pike said:
We are of the latter type. There is nothing wrong with Richard in bed, let me tell you!
Good!
Richard and Maria Pike said:
Our element of risk comes from the fact that I have some kind of "connection" with all my lovers. I am not one who chooses simply on the physical plane, and have no interests in "big studs with big cocks" or anything like that. I am sort of an intellectual critter and like a mental, or at least energetic, connection with lovers, something strong enough to make my blood boil.
I think that's the interpersonal chemistry element, as noted above.
Richard and Maria Pike said:
Yeah, I wonder why no one thinks about the younger guys. Like I said, I cannot mix it up at work anymore, and the junior college seems like an ideal solution. Men that age just want an older woman as a fantasy creature, a "Mrs. Robinson."
Yes, I think "The Graduate" hit on a strongly-erotic element that I would guess is widespread among young men. I mean, I haven't done a nationwide survey or anything, but the success of the movie... which I remember well... would certainly seem to indicate that, and I felt it myself. I also remember feeling that Mrs. Robinson's young daughter, whom The Graduate (played by Dustin Hoffman) was *really* in love with (supposedly), didn't have any particular appeal relative to her older mother.
Richard and Maria Pike said:
That's exactly what I want too.
Excellent! Nothing wrong with that. Wanting young men who are physically good-looking and sexually hot is entirely proper and appropriate for a sexually, mentally and emotionally mature woman such as yourself. BTW, there have been some steamy threads in this forum about married women similar to you in age (or older) fucking much younger... nubile, one might say... 18 to 20 year-old men.
Richard and Maria Pike said:
I wonder if I can create any sort of mental connection with folk so young that they prefer cyberworld to reality, but we shall see.
I think you'll find you can. I suspect you'll also find that, facing the possibility then the reality of having the real thing, your young men may no longer prefer cyberfantasy.
Richard and Maria Pike said:
Another thing.... you talk about becoming known as the "campus slut." But to me this is different.
I didn't mean that in any derogatory way. It would only be undesirable if you consider it undesirable (IMO). If you consider it a good thing to be viewed in that way, hey... go for it. As I mentioned, it will likely result in an expanding... perhaps rapidly expanding... circle of young lovers for you.
Richard and Maria Pike said:
At work it is just awful -- esp. the open hostility from the other women I work with, not to mention getting my butt goosed whenever I turn my back on a guy.
Yes...
Richard and Maria Pike said:
But the "campus slut" thing is different for a couple of reasons. The junior college I am thinking of is about 30 minutes drive from here. No one in our social circle goes there or has any connection with it. So I am in a "new world" which is not at all bound to my "ordinary world." So that means I am totally free. I was raised in a very conservative, evangelical environment, married a "decent man" right out of high school. It was not till I was divorced at age 29 that I began to suspect I was not the "good girl" I was raised to be. That is when I began to experiment. Still, I work as a legal secretary, and despite the occasional short skirt I have to maintain a very professional demeanor.
In my opinion, there's no reason to think sexuality (/sex drive) should be a function of religious upbringing, current religious beliefs, or whether one's parents are socially and/or politically "conservative." Rather, there's every reason to think (in my opinion) it's a function of human variability. See my post on this subject in this thread, above, in which I introduce 1-on-1 basketball as an analogy.
Richard and Maria Pike said:
What if I were in an environment where I could be openly, blatantly slutty? Like cultivating a "jolly old wench" personality who greets guys with a kiss, tugs her skirt down while asking whether they liked the light blue panties better than the pink ones, laughs at lewd jokes and tells many of her own....
For women such as yourself, and I'm sure you aren't "sexually unique"*, it sounds like some sort of nirvana, doesn't it...? (*Remember the basic principle derived from observations of phenomena ranging from cockroaches and mosquitoes to stars in the universe: "If you see one, you can be sure you ain't seen them all.")
Richard and Maria Pike said:
Psychologically, I know this would be "radical compensation" behavior for the repressive way I grew up, but... It is a fantasy which Richard and I often play out in the bedroom, and being the campus slut might actually be fun, since no one we know is involved with the junior college, so I am free there. And if I don't like it, well.... I am just taking courses for fun, not for a degree, I already have an MA, so just drop the class, right?
Right. Incidentally... as I'm sure you know... there will be a time period during which you can drop your psychology class and enroll in another without penalty. Thus, if you assess your psych classmates and decide the prospects there don't look too good (maybe most of them will appear to be psychopaths or sociopaths, for instance [joke... laugh here]), you might consider dropping that course and enrolling in another. It occurs to me a large lecture course might offer better possibilities than a small class of (say) 20 or so students.
Richard and Maria Pike said:
I kind of like the idea of being a "cougar on the prowl," a 40 year old woman who makes no secret of her liking for 20-something guys. Sounds like fun to me.
So do I. In fact, I find the whole concept of "older" women being cougars very hot. If I were one of your 18 to 20 year-old lovers-in-waiting (or just observing from the sidelines, as it were), my growing awareness that you're a "cougar on the prowl" would seem real steamy. But, for me those days are long in the past.
When, Mrs. Robinson I mean Mrs. Pike, will you be starting your community college adventure? Have you enrolled for summer session, or do you intend to begin with fall semester '11?
—Custer