This is not to argue that whatever turns you on among consenting adults is bad. If a man or woman wants to have 'relations' with a concrete cinder block...more power to you. To the extent that the cuckold fetish is popular, it is strange that such an archaic device is also popular among some in the subculture.
In the middle ages the chastity belt was the anti-cuckolding tool of husbands everywhere. It was certainly not good for the wife (regardless of sexual proclivities) or for would be interlopers either. Why then do submissives want to lock away the only source of physical pleasure available in the sexual realm? Would a 'bait & switch' for the bull and wife be well received? By that, I mean how about a chastity belt/cbtrucker 3000 for the bull and wife while we're at it?!? Even better (and the bible thumpers would love this) a World Web Wide chastity device that prevents any sort of erotica from being accessed by any computer any time? Sound sexy? Of course not.
Whether it is fantasy or 'reality' the cuckold is facilitating enhanced sexual pleasure to the wife and lover. Expecting the cuck to lock it up is greedy and an abuse of influence.
In the middle ages the chastity belt was the anti-cuckolding tool of husbands everywhere. It was certainly not good for the wife (regardless of sexual proclivities) or for would be interlopers either. Why then do submissives want to lock away the only source of physical pleasure available in the sexual realm? Would a 'bait & switch' for the bull and wife be well received? By that, I mean how about a chastity belt/cbtrucker 3000 for the bull and wife while we're at it?!? Even better (and the bible thumpers would love this) a World Web Wide chastity device that prevents any sort of erotica from being accessed by any computer any time? Sound sexy? Of course not.
Whether it is fantasy or 'reality' the cuckold is facilitating enhanced sexual pleasure to the wife and lover. Expecting the cuck to lock it up is greedy and an abuse of influence.