Doc in Cleveland said:Without going into a thesis-like Custer extended expression, let me say...
Ouch, that smarts...
(Also, it brings to mind a phrase attributed to former-President John F. Kennedy during a news briefing: "Let me say this about that..." Obviously, the gears in his head were turning as he stalled for time, if only momentarily, trying to think of a good reply to whatever the question was.)
Doc in Cleveland said:No matter the money or the muscles or the societal standing or even the stratosphere-scraping, over-the-top importance of a full head of hair on a man .. there is no still way to express the subtle, subliminal, unsaid, but deeply-felt crushing ballistic importance of a large penis.
Whew! Those are by far the most over-the-top accolades of the profoundly-important scope and significance on a societal scale of a large and meaty cock I've ever seen.
But, is it necessarily true...? Some years ago, while in the locker room at a local resort that includes a hot-spring swimming pool, I had removed my swimsuit in order to get dressed. Another man exited a shower stall and walked toward me, totally nude. He had a VERY long and large penis that swung as he walked. Other than that, he was shorter than average, not overweight, and had an expression of submissive meekness on his face characteristic of a man who feels himself inferior to the other men around him (some nude, some not, none with exceptional cocks). Having participated in this forum for some time, I was aware of the supposed self-confident nature of "real men" (as they're called) with large cocks. The contrast between that mental image and the apparent low self-esteem of the man before me seemed so striking that I remember it clearly.
—Custer