I, and perhaps others, would appreciate it if you would clarify your interesting post, Ckc.
ckc said:
My wife's sister let it out [to my wife] that she thought she was pregnant. The first words from my other sister-in-law (my wife's other sister; I was not present) were: You can't be; he [your husband] was fixed, he can't [have impregnated you]... OMG!!! [suddenly realizing, evidently, my wife's sister must have been impregnated by a lover]. All this was according to my wife.
But, my sister-in-law [who thought she might be pregnant] told her parents that she was afraid she was pregnant by a black man.
It seems unwise, to say the least, for your sister-in-law to have said that to her parents before she knew for a fact that she was pregnant, unless she also knew for a fact that her parents would be OK with that. In which case, it still seems unwise.
ckc said:
Damn [I thought], my brother-in-law is a cuck, cause she [my wife's sister] is still married [to him], but she was not [i.e., could not have been] pregnant [by him].
Is this the right interpretation...?
ckc said:
My wife said, you were right, she [my sister] was seeing that black guy, like you said.
Sounds like you got it right...
ckc said:
A few weeks later, my sister-in-law asked why I was the only one who seemed OK with what happened. I smiled, and said "I understand that BBC is better." My sister-in-law hinted that she was still getting bbc.
If so, good for your sister-in-law. And, good for you too, for implying — via your calm response — that you thought this whole scene was reasonable and normal; no big deal.
But, what affect has this had on your sister-in-law's parents, whom your SIL told she thought she had been impregnated by her black lover?
That is, is your SIL actually pregnant? And, whether she is or isn't, how did her parents respond to what she told them?
And, what affect has this had on her "fixed" husband, your brother-in-law? Is he cool with this, or is it destroying your SIL's and BIL's marriage...?