• Seems like a lot of people are having an issue logging into chat since we updated. Here is what you need to do: Logout of the chat and forums, clear your cache and cookies. Log back in to the forum, then login to the chat with the same user/pass you use for the forums.

ID this teen?

  • Thread starterirphan
  • Start date
vid is bs. just an ad

it ends right before her top comes off. and just makes me want to see the rest of it.

damn them!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not spam, just an honest desire to find more pics/vid of this chick's tits. And yeah, they obviously can't act, and to call any of the ostensible story lines in net porn a 'plot' is kind of generous. But that's not really why I watch.

And the file is downloadable (where it reads 'Download this video'). It's 8 min/32 Mb and shows her top coming off, her tits sucked and she starts sucking them both.
 
You are so right on so often

Will & Eve said:
Is this spam?

Single-post poster always sends up a flag.

Besides that, for all the effort they went to in order to set up a "real" plot...I had to laugh when the girl with the massive fucking Tat says "my parents are pretty strict"

LOL!

I've yet to meet a classy woman with a lot of tats. A beautiful classy woman who loves to fuck is hot. When she goes black, it's super-hot. When I see pics of a woman with a bunch of tats having sex, I don't think, Wow, here's a hot classy woman living the fantasy." I think, "here's a low life in it for the money."

My eighteen year old recently came to my wife and me to discuss getting a tattoo. Our reply to her was, "Name someone with a tattoo that you respect." She couldn't.

There are of course exceptions, but anyone with a modicum of wisdom knows that there is a general inverse relationship between a high education and/or intelligence level with the propensity to have tattoos.
 
IndyHubby said:
anyone with a modicum of wisdom knows that there is a general inverse relationship between a high education and/or intelligence level with the propensity to have tattoos.

no offense but thats just ridiculous. I know plenty of college professors with tats and i know plenty of people with tattoos who are just crazy smart. to think less of someone who has tattoos is pretty shallow. there are people who get tattoos because its art, and some just get it because its trendy/rebellious/blah blah blah. i think you get my point. its pretty lame to judge someone based on something as cosmetic as that.
 
whiskey said:
no offense but thats just ridiculous. I know plenty of college professors with tats and i know plenty of people with tattoos who are just crazy smart. to think less of someone who has tattoos is pretty shallow. there are people who get tattoos because its art, and some just get it because its trendy/rebellious/blah blah blah. i think you get my point. its pretty lame to judge someone based on something as cosmetic as that.
If you are going to quote me, do it accurately. I actually wrote: "There are of course exceptions, but anyone with a modicum of wisdom knows that there is a general inverse relationship between a high education and/or intelligence level with the propensity to have tattoos."
I disagree with my statement as quoted by you. Sorry but the way you've stood on your soapbox without the full quote leads me to believe you may lack that modicum I referred to.
 
ok, is THIS better?fucks sake

IndyHubby said:
I've yet to meet a classy woman with a lot of tats. A beautiful classy woman who loves to fuck is hot. When she goes black, it's super-hot. When I see pics of a woman with a bunch of tats having sex, I don't think, Wow, here's a hot classy woman living the fantasy." I think, "here's a low life in it for the money."

My eighteen year old recently came to my wife and me to discuss getting a tattoo. Our reply to her was, "Name someone with a tattoo that you respect." She couldn't.

There are of course exceptions, but anyone with a modicum of wisdom knows that there is a general inverse relationship between a high education and/or intelligence level with the propensity to have tattoos.



i didnt feel it necessary to quote the entire rant as im sure there are plenty of people who know how to use a message board and actually read the posts before mine.

anyone with a "modicum" of knowledge can see what you say is a lame statement. dont be so judgemental. im not here insulting you, just saying that tattoos are hardly a barometer of ones morals/education. it's not the 1950's. if there are always exceptions then doesnt that mean that you shouldnt have such a poor blanket opinion considering people with tats? bah, whatever. believe what you want. just offering a different perspective to the whole thing. getting inked up is trendy yes but really it is what it is. surface. and thats not something you can judge a person on.
you ask your daughter if she knows anyone with tattoos that she respects. who cares if she cant name anyone. would you still respect your daughter if she got a tattoo?

btw i dont have any ink as i personally am not a fan of that. but i have a majority of friends who take in the art of it all. so maybe i AM part of the"modicum" you refer to. friends? friends!
 
IndyHubby said:
anyone with a modicum of wisdom knows that there is a general inverse relationship

Whiskey payed attention to all the words but the most important one in that sentence.

IndyHubby said:
My eighteen year old recently came to my wife and me to discuss getting a tattoo. Our reply to her was, "Name someone with a tattoo that you respect." She couldn't.

Thank you for a great line that I'm sure I'll be copping as my own in about 8-10 years.

On this topic, however, a buddy of mine has a theory regarding tats for when we're at topless bars: "I love a girl who's willing to make a decision she'll regret for the rest of her life."

;-)

BJSHREDDER
 
As an "educated" white male, I have 2 tat's. They were not "in the moment" nor were they put on in a drunken show of male machoness (if there is such a word). I know many people who are highly educated, from many walks of life who have beautiful tats.

Of course, we have a society that "frowns" on such things, and looks upon those with tats as "uneducated", drunks, druggies etc.

If one looks upon the history of tattoos, they are an ancient art from several civilizations, from the Orient to Africa and other cultures. Tattoos were looked as a passing into adulthood, decoration for love or for enemy.

The main reason our culture frowns on them is because of early sailors who went to the Orient and got them. Soon the Art, such as it was then, as opposed to now, traveled to this country.

Now "tats" are used for many different reasons. From the prison population to identify the gang they are with to highly educated people who take a considerable amount of time to decide what they want (even to the point of sketching it out, as I did one of mine), and to determine placement so as to not be a public viewing.

It is unfortunate that there are many these days who are having to either remove their tats to keep or get a job, to those who wear clothing to cover them at their jobs.

Also, those that don't have tats, have no clue about how it feels to get one. One has to have a certain amount of strength and discipline to keep still while being tattooed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread