Strange stains on panties - Your help needed (with photos)

[GordonPym]

Hi guys.
This post is related to my previous one "Is she just a teaser ... or just a slut?" which you can easily find browsing this forum.

Basically I saw in my wife's drawer a blue garter belt with panties embedded, which I'd never seen on her.
The pantie's crotch has a whitish stain, the nature of which I cannot understand/interpret.

It could be cum, but it could be just her vagina's natural release.

I would be interested in your sincere opinion.
If you are a girl, it's even better!

Here are the photos of that stain.
I also put a photo of the same stain, taken some month ago.
My impression, but I might be wrong, that the stain was much "fresher" in May rather than today (in October), showing that whan I took the first photo the stain was quite recent. (Again, your opinion would be much appreciated).

I am also attaching one photo taken with a black-light, if that may help.

Thank you all.
- GordonPym

 

[bbwifelover]

If that's cum it isn't much my wifes are covered when she comes home if she's been fucked.

 

[GordonPym]

If that's cum it isn't much my wifes are covered when she comes home if she's been fucked.

Anyways, do you agree with me that those panties have been used at least once?
Because I've never ever seen them on Linda...

 

[hiki]

The fact that she even owns a set like that (which you have never seen in use) is very suspicious, a hopeful sign to your desires I wonder what she gets up to when you're away...

 

[bbwifelover]

O for sure those have been used in my opinion.

 

[zippless]

I say no as well unless she got fucked last at the gang bang.

 

[zippless]

My bad. I did not see the thickness of the panties and the large area of the stains pic in this.
I change my vote to she got " Fucked" and you are now a cuck. Congrats.

 

[GordonPym]

The fact that she even owns a set like that (which you have never seen in use) is very suspicious, a hopeful sign to your desires I wonder what she gets up to when you're away...

Regretfully I must say that my wife had shown me that garter belt in the past, so it was not a secret item.
Simply she never wore it for me.
That stain could've been done while trying it on, I presume.
So - provided that the stain is not cum - it really does not prove much, I'm afraid...
On the contrary, should it be cum, then...
Also - IMPORTANT - she purchased those suspenders a couple of years ago. The fact that the stain looked much "fresher" on the May 25 photo, would mean that the stain has been made much later than the day of purchase: hence Linda used them for someone else.
Note that Linda - in spite of my insistence - is NOT one of those girls who wears fine lingerie for her day-to-day activities

 

[GordonPym]

Doubts...

I am now very doubtful about the nature of the stain on the Blue Garter Belt!
I've attached one more closeup of that stain, taken in May 2013.
I've also attached four photos of a pair of my wife's panties soaked with cum (it's cum, I am sure - and it is very likely to be mine...)
(Even after washing, the stains are clearly visible.)
You see? They look completely different... Especially the thickest part (top left of the inner crotch) looks darker under the black-light, while the similar thick spot on the Blue Garter Belt glows.

 

[ekon007]

most of stains look like normal discharge..i may be wrong butt its what it looks like to me..

 

[GordonPym]

most of stains look like normal discharge..i may be wrong butt its what it looks like to me..

The stains on the grey panties are real cum, that's for sure - because I know it's cum
The stain on the Blue Suspender Belt, that's the mysterious one... (?)