Ah... but where would erotic romanticism be today if not for insoluble conundrums...?
Hi Ms. Victoria,
Your comment:
Victoria said:
I've been thinking lately that I would like to embark on a journey to embrace the 'hot wife' title a bit more often...
so...
..today KA and I were out playing golf. I think it was on the 4th hole I suggested that I would like to cuckold him more often than I have been over the past couple of years.
brought to mind one of your earlier comments, in response to a post by STB:
Victoria said:
.... I have seen my 'bull' three times in 14 months.
i.e., you've been fucking a man other than your husband about once per 4.7 months, on average. (Whew! It took a lot of rereading of your thread to unearth that statistic.)
At the time, it occurred to me to respond with something like:"um... really? Are you sure you're getting enough...?"
But, I resisted the urge... in part because I suspected you and your husband might not particularly welcome a comment of that nature, and also (I must confess) because I didn't want to trigger further suggestions that I'm a "tease," which could degrade the serious demeanor I attempt to project on this forum. (Heh heh... joke, laugh here.)
Victoria said:
Currently, it seems that me being with another man consists of a concentrated amount of time, then we don't have any 'extra curricular' play for several months. (I'm not sure if I helped his golf game much with my timing ;-) but I played well!! or maybe the distraction was when I told him I had left the house commando under my golf skirt?)
Well, there are, of course, many ways of winning at golf. I mean, suppose Tiger Wood's most serious competitors were all women. How much better off today would he be if, at the tee-up for the most challenging hole in each major international tournament, the hole that would most likely decide the winner, he strolled past his main rival and whispered under his breath: "sweetheart, your husband tells me he's frustrated and has decided to begin fucking his lover MUCH more frequently..." followed by, somewhere on the fairway, "I'm playing commando today, darling, under these tight golf pants..."
Victoria said:
Anyways...
Since we've gotten home KA has told me that he is not interested in me having a weekly lover...
No, no... of course not.
Victoria said:
No, no... certainly not.
Victoria said:
but we did agree that perhaps once a month would be a good average.
Excellent! Clearly you're a skilled negotiator. How can your husband object to a mere factor of 5 increase (well, 4.7 to be more exact) in your extra-marital fucking? I mean, it's not like you're asking him to acquiesce in a factor of 10 step-up.
Victoria said:
Now, I'm wondering would I be cheating on Sage if I were to do that?
Actually, "cheating" on Sage would be wise cuckolding strategy, IMO, because it would reduce the possibility of you and Sage becoming emotionally involved with each other to the detriment of your relationship with your husband. On a simple level, the concept is: more lovers => lower probability of emotional involvement with any one of them.
Victoria said:
It all gets very complicated...
Yes, a corollary on the minus side would be, more lovers => greater difficulty in balancing and meshing your sked with all of theirs. A corollary on the plus side would be, more possibilities for finding a lover with a sked you can match at any given time when you wish to do so.
Victoria said:
Not to mention I would have no idea how to go about making it happen.
I think you'll find what you have in mind is both possible and quite feasible.
Victoria said:
.... but if [a given prospective lover is] not into being a 'bull,' it would end up being something I'm not interested in.
Hm... is this a distinction without a difference? How does one distinguish between a lover who "wants to have a fling" and a lover who "wants to be a bull"?
Victoria said:
It is quite the conundrum... and as of now I don't have a solution.... xoxo —Victoria
Ah... but how could erotic romanticism exist without the complexities of insoluble problems accompanied by implausible, daring, imaginative (and sometimes breath-taking) solutions?
—Custer