Far out... I like it!
Watcherfool,
watcherfool said:
Funny, I was thinking that in all likelihood, Cassielove is an invention of Custer and this dialogue is all going on inside his head.
Brilliant deduction WF! I like it!
watcherfool said:
Of course, I may be wrong.
Unfortunately, this is definitely a possibility...
watcherfool said:
But I am reasonably sure of one thing, Cassie Love does not exist and the pics displayed are bogus.
However, someone exists and wrote those posts and posted those pictures. You're right about one thing: "Cassielove" is obviously a screen name and so, in that sense, she does not exist. Whether her story and pics are "bogus" is a different question.
watcherfool said:
Obviously I am not the only person here to have arrived at this conclusion...
What's this, Truth by Democracy? If more than one person "believes" something, it must be true? Many people "believe" lots of things that are wrong. An obvious example would be the Bible. Huge numbers of people strongly believe it is "the word of God" and literally true in all respects. But, the Bible cannot be literally true because it is self-contradictory in many places. This simple disproof of a widely-held communal "belief" can be verified by anyone willing to spend some time on it... and not very much time, at that.
watcherfool said:
...and I don't see this happening on other threads.
You don't see what happening in other threads?
watcherfool said:
But hey, who cares, it is all fantasy anyway.
"Fantasy" is certainly a possibility, as with any anonymous thread. I cannot vouch for the "truth" of Ms. Cassielove's anonymous posts just as I cannot vouch for the "truth" of anyone else's, and do not claim to do so. Rather, I've contributed to this thread because I find Ms. Cassielove's story... as described in her posts... interesting.
watcherfool said:
Carry on custer, er, cassie...
Sorry, you and I and the rest of this forum will have to await further posts from Ms. Cassielove (whoever she is) to know how her situation and those of her two woman friends are developing.
I suppose I should feel complimented, though, that you think I am secretly the author of Ms. Cassielove's story while also "responding" to it with posts of my own, because... if it's fictional... it's a rather creative work of fiction. Definitely out of the ordinary. But you'll be disappointed to hear, no doubt, that I don't have multiple personalities in this forum for purposes of making up fictional threads so I can "respond" to them myself, for two reasons that should be obvious to anyone: (i) there's no reason to; and (ii) even if I considered that a desirable thing to do (for some unknown reason), it would require way too much time and effort. To put it simply, it would be too much work — and I'm not among those (if there are any) who delight in doing purposeless work for no reason.
Besides, the spectrum of threads appearing in this forum is so varied and interesting... and probably enough of them describe real experiences... that any "need" for me or anyone else (IMO) to make up fictional threads, let alone fictional threads including self-responses, is precluded.
—Custer